City of Lake Forest Measure F — Lake Forest Election Reform and Voter Choice Measure (Orange County)
Ballot measure · November 3, 2026 · Lake Forest voters
Results: the official election results site. Counts are unofficial until certified.
- What it does
- Shall the measure limiting city council members to two consecutive terms in office with a mandatory four-year out of office period before being eligible to serve for another two consecutive terms in office, be adopted?
- A YES vote means
- Lake Forest City Council members would be limited to two consecutive terms, then must be out of office four years before serving again.
- A NO vote means
- This two-consecutive-term limit would not be set for Lake Forest City Council members.
- Needed to pass
- A simple majority: more than half of the YES and NO votes on this measure must be YES. Leaving it blank doesn't count either way.
- Left–right lean
- Not a left–right issue: a procedural or local question that liberals and conservatives don't typically split on (AI read of the official ballot summary).
Explained
Today
- Since voters passed Measure S in 2018 (82.5% yes), Lake Forest Municipal Code Section 2.04.080 bars anyone from serving as a City Council member or Mayor for more than two four-year terms. Voice of OC and the measure's opponents describe this as a lifetime limit.
- Serving at least two years of a term counts as a full term.
If it passes
- A person could serve two consecutive four-year terms, then would have to be out of office for at least four consecutive years.
- After that break, the person could serve up to two more consecutive terms, and this could repeat with no limit on the number of times.
- The City Attorney's impartial analysis says the four-year break would apply to new or re-elected members starting with the 2026 election and would not increase the number of consecutive terms available to current members.
- It would take effect 10 days after the City Council declares the vote result.
Who would notice
Lake Forest voters and current and former City Council members, including two members who term out in November 2026 under the current rule. It does not change any tax.
How it got here
The City Council placed it on the ballot. In January 2026 the Council unanimously dropped a proposal to extend terms to three and asked staff to draft a four-year waiting period instead. Councilmember Mark Tettemer said the lifetime ban is what he struggles with most.
In the news
Background
The Lake Forest City Council placed this measure on the ballot, according to the City Attorney's impartial analysis; the city's current limit of two four-year terms for council members and the mayor has been in place since voters passed Measure S in 2018.
Under Measure F, a person who has served two four-year terms could serve again after at least four consecutive years out of office, and then serve up to two more terms; the analysis states the change would not give current members additional consecutive terms.
The voter guide includes an argument against the measure and notes that no argument in favor was submitted.
Next elections here
Also on Orange County ballots
- City of Costa Mesa Measure C — The Costa Mesa Fair Business License Reform, Small Business Protection Measure
- City of Irvine Measure D — Measure Directing the Use of Ranked Choice Voting for City Council Member and Mayoral Elections after January 1, 2028
- City of Laguna Beach Measure E — An Ordinance of the People of the City of Laguna Beach, California, Adding Section 2.04.080 to the Laguna Beach Municipal Code to Establish Term Limits for City Council Members
- City of Los Alamitos Measure G — Los Alamitos Hotel Tax (TOT Measure)
- City of Newport Beach Measure H — City of Newport Beach General Plan – Amendment
- City of Orange Measure I — City of Orange Public Safety/Essential Services Measure
- City of Orange Measure J — City of Orange Hotel Guest Tax Modification Measure
- City of Orange Measure K — Proposed Charter for the City of Orange
- City of Placentia Measure L — Placentia Hotel Tax Measure
- City of San Clemente Measure M — San Clemente Natural Hazards Sales Tax Citizens Initiative
- City of Santa Ana Measure N — Santa Ana Streets, Public Safety, Essential City Services Measure
- City of Westminster Measure O — Westminster City Services Measure
Quick answers
- What does a YES vote on City of Lake Forest Measure F mean?
- Lake Forest City Council members would be limited to two consecutive terms, then must be out of office four years before serving again.
- What does a NO vote on City of Lake Forest Measure F mean?
- This two-consecutive-term limit would not be set for Lake Forest City Council members.
- Could Councilmembers Voigts and Tettemer run again?
- Both term out in November 2026. The argument against says Measure F would let them return after a break; the City Attorney's analysis says it would not add consecutive terms for current members. Under the measure's text, anyone who has served two consecutive terms must sit out four years before serving again.
- Were arguments filed?
- An argument against was filed by former Mayor James (Jim) Gardner. No argument in favor was submitted.
- What vote does it need?
- A simple majority.
- How many votes does City of Lake Forest Measure F need to pass?
- A simple majority: more than half of the YES and NO votes on this measure must be YES. Leaving it blank doesn't count either way.
- Should I vote yes or no on City of Lake Forest Measure F?
- SpectrumVote doesn't endorse anyone or tell you how to vote. Read what a YES and a NO vote each do, and the official text, then decide based on what you want to happen.
- When is the vote?
- The general election was Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Counts are unofficial until each state certifies its results over the following weeks; your state or county election office has the official results.
See something wrong on this page? Report a problem · Corrections