Franklin County Issue 20 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
Ballot measure · November 3, 2026 · Gahanna voters
Results: the official election results site. Counts are unofficial until certified.
- What it does
- Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment — Shall Section 4.02, Composition and Term, of Article IV, The Council, be amended to revise the process for adjusting ward boundaries to base it on federal decennial census population data and specified population disparity criteria?
- A YES vote means
- Gahanna would adjust ward boundaries based on federal census population data and set population disparity criteria.
- A NO vote means
- Gahanna's current process for adjusting ward boundaries would not change.
- Needed to pass
- A simple majority: more than half of the YES and NO votes on this measure must be YES. Leaving it blank doesn't count either way.
- Left–right lean
- Not a left–right issue: a procedural or local question that liberals and conservatives don't typically split on (AI read of the official ballot summary).
Explained
Today
- Gahanna's City Council has seven members: four elected from wards and three elected at large, all for four-year terms.
- The Charter says ward boundaries are to be balanced "to the extent practicable based on numbers of registered voters," set by ordinance taking effect 60 days before the petition filing deadline for ward elections.
If it passes
- Ward boundaries would be balanced based on population as determined by the federal decennial census, instead of registered voters, beginning in 2030.
- Boundaries would be rebalanced only if there is a population difference of 20% or more between the largest and smallest wards.
- Boundaries would still be set by ordinance taking effect 60 days before the filing deadline. The number of wards, at-large seats and terms would not change.
Who would notice
Gahanna residents and voters, whose ward lines could shift after a census, and candidates for ward Council seats. It has no tax effect.
How it got here
Recommended by the 2026 Charter Review Commission, which said the purpose is to move ward balancing "from a registered-voter basis to a resident-population basis" using 10-year census data and to set criteria for when boundaries need rebalancing. Council placed it on the ballot by Resolution RES-0028-2026, passed July 20, 2026.
Background
The 2026 Gahanna Charter Review Commission, a seven-member body appointed by Council and the Mayor, recommended this amendment among ten it transmitted to City Council on June 30, 2026; Council adopted the resolution placing it on the ballot on its consent agenda on July 20, 2026.
The Charter now requires Council ward boundaries to be balanced, as far as practicable, by the number of registered voters; the amendment would base them on population from the federal decennial census beginning in 2030.
Under the proposed text, boundaries would be redrawn only if the population difference between the largest and smallest wards is 20% or more, according to the Commission's Exhibit A.
Next elections here
Also on Franklin County ballots
- Franklin County Issue 18 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 19 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 21 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 22 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 23 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 24 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 25 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 26 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 27 — Gahanna – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 28 — Grove City – Proposed Charter Amendment (by petition)
- Franklin County Issue 34 — Upper Arlington – Proposed Tax Levy (Renewal and Increase)
- Franklin County Issue 35 — Worthington – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 36 — Worthington – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 37 — Worthington – Proposed Charter Amendment
- Franklin County Issue 38 — Worthington – Proposed Charter Amendment (by petition)
- Franklin County Issue 40 — Brown Township (unincorporated area) – Proposed Zoning Plan
Quick answers
- What does a YES vote on Franklin County Issue 20 mean?
- Gahanna would adjust ward boundaries based on federal census population data and set population disparity criteria.
- What does a NO vote on Franklin County Issue 20 mean?
- Gahanna's current process for adjusting ward boundaries would not change.
- Would ward lines change right away?
- No. Population-based balancing would begin with the 2030 federal census, and only if the largest and smallest wards differ in population by 20% or more.
- What is the difference between counting registered voters and population?
- Registered voters counts only people signed up to vote; census population counts all residents. The Commission described the change as moving to a resident-population basis.
- How many votes does Franklin County Issue 20 need to pass?
- A simple majority: more than half of the YES and NO votes on this measure must be YES. Leaving it blank doesn't count either way.
- Should I vote yes or no on Franklin County Issue 20?
- SpectrumVote doesn't endorse anyone or tell you how to vote. Read what a YES and a NO vote each do, and the official text, then decide based on what you want to happen.
- When is the vote?
- The general election was Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Counts are unofficial until each state certifies its results over the following weeks; your state or county election office has the official results.
See something wrong on this page? Report a problem · Corrections